Pro vs. con view
Topic space viewKyoto Protocol is important symbol in climate fight
The Kyoto Protocol is the most important international environmental and global warming treaty ever created. Joining it, and making it succeed is a very important symbolic measure in the life of this environmental movement. Rejecting it, or letting it fail, damages the long-term viability of this movement.
97% of Climate Scientists Don't Actually Agree
All scientists agree that science is something worth dedication their professional life to. Thus 100% of scientists agree.
"Fixing the Climate" should be a Low Priority for the USA
ditto
"Fixing the Climate" should be a Low Priority for the USA
darn
"Fixing the Climate" should be a Low Priority for the USA
Anyone Else up for a Debate?
it is not wrong for catholics to vote for a prochoice president, in this political climate
My opponent has offered no source for her claims concerning the Pope, so please disregard them at this time. I, on the other hand, offer a quote from an official papal encyclical (Evangelium Vitae, paragraph 73): "In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia, it is therefore never licit to obey it, or to "take part in a propaganda campaign in favour of such a law, or vote for it" Remember, dear voters, this debate is NOT about whether you are pro-life or pro-choice. It's about whether or not the Catholic Church says it's ok for its members to vote pro-choice. I think we all know the answer to that. With all due respect to my opponent, this debate is basically over. Please vote Con. Source: 1.http://www.vatican.va...
Behavioral change is the key to environmental sustainability
Seeing as he has no intention of responding, I will simply extend my arguments once again
Behavioral change is the key to environmental sustainability
It is fairly clear that the con has no intention of responding. I extand all arguments, and will wait to see if he responds
Behavioral change is the key to environmental sustainability
I rest my case, seeing as the Con has failed to respond to any of my arguments and foreited every round, I can only see a Pro vote
Terrorists use our own media to terrify our people and create a climate of fear.
Attempting to prevent your public ever having to deal with the terrifying realities of events in the international world is doomed to failure. People always manage to find out about some aspect of terrorist attacks one way or the other, and fear is spread, not contained, when the public don’t feel the government is telling them the truth. In reality, people rarely change their behaviour as a result of fear generated by terrorism – use of the London underground revived rapidly after the July 7th Bombings, and use of air travel soon recovered from the impact of 9/11.
