Forward all points.
Climate Shift
Forward all points.
Climate Shift
Forward all points.
Climate Shift
I accept.
it is not wrong for catholics to vote for a prochoice president, in this political climate
con has taken it upon himself to define what proportinoate reasons means, on behalf of the catholic church. given it wasn't defined, it is more open to interpretation. and, the quoted part where ratzinger said a catholic can't vote for a prochoice person because they are prochoice, was irrelevant to this situation.... the people are voting for them in spite of their prochoice stance. given proportional reasons is open to interpretation, it would make common sense to say if nothing is going to change to vote for a candidate, that you don't have to vote on that issue. a common issue presented back in the days of that quote, was torture. eg A is prolife but protorture, an intrinsic evil. B is prochoice but not protorture. the abortion issue won't change as a practical matter in this hypothetical. torture is pivotal on who wins. everything else is the same issue wise. how is it not proportionate to vote for B given torture has a chance of changing? it is proportionate. anything else would be to read an agenda into the pope's words.
CMV: The internet (not Climate Change) will be the cause of the extinction of our specie via widespread depression caused by accessibility of informations enabling the comparison with the #1 person in every domain
The internet has produced extreme advances in every possible areas of humanity and it's responsible for the rise in Gross Domestic Product since the late 1990s and up to the new millennium. But if the platform is new, the use which humans do of it is always directed by market forces which are on their own directed by our nature (see for example how the vast majority of the internet is pornographic content). Our nature is to compare ourselves with others and the internet has exacerbated this phenomenon and literally have it run wild If you are a small owner trying to provide for your family you have the Bezos 200B net worth in your face all the times, if you are a girl trying to feel cute about her body..then you have Emily Ratajowski in your face, again, all the time And our nature, by the way, is not to look away and don't pay attention to our competitors but to keep head down and grind to eventually reach #1 and finally be happy. But the notion of #1 implies that there can only be only one winner and 7,999,999,999 losers at this game. So we are already seeing a comparison induced depression state across the board, but this is nothing yet compared with what's about to hit us. It will hit us from the inside , unlike any external enemy and it will be global You think the current situation is bad? It's still seen nothing compared to the violence of an enemy which we can't even study and have no hope of defeating. At least with But if the platform is new, the use which humans do of it is always directed by market forces which are on their own directed by our nature (see for example how the vast majority of the internet is pornographic content). Our nature is to compare ourselves with others and the internet has exacerbated this phenomenon and literally have it run wild If you are a small owner trying to provide for your family you have the Bezos 200B net worth in your face all the times, if you are a girl trying to feel cute about her body..then you have Emily Ratajowski in your face, again, all the time And our nature, by the way, is not to look away and don't pay attention to our competitors but to keep head down and grind to eventually reach #1 and finally be happy. But the notion of #1 implies that there can only be only one winner and 7,999,999,999 losers at this game. So we are already seeing a comparison induced depression state across the board, but this is nothing yet compared with what's about to hit us. It will hit us from the inside , unlike any external enemy and it will be global You think the current situation is bad? It's still seen nothing compared to the violence of an enemy which we can't even study and have no hope of defeating. At least with Our nature is to compare ourselves with others and the internet has exacerbated this phenomenon and literally have it run wild If you are a small owner trying to provide for your family you have the Bezos 200B net worth in your face all the times, if you are a girl trying to feel cute about her body..then you have Emily Ratajowski in your face, again, all the time And our nature, by the way, is not to look away and don't pay attention to our competitors but to keep head down and grind to eventually reach #1 and finally be happy. But the notion of #1 implies that there can only be only one winner and 7,999,999,999 losers at this game. So we are already seeing a comparison induced depression state across the board, but this is nothing yet compared with what's about to hit us. It will hit us from the inside , unlike any external enemy and it will be global You think the current situation is bad? It's still seen nothing compared to the violence of an enemy which we can't even study and have no hope of defeating. At least with climate as well as the current situation we know what we should do to solve the problem (it's more a matter of getting our act together and doing it), but with this particular enemy (comparison induced depression) there's nothing we can do. We don't even know how to attack it
Climate shift
I regret my opponents forfeit. I hope he can return promptly. Forward all points.
Climate shift
Forward all points.
Climate shift
I disagree and I am ready to debate!
McCain offers the right kind of change
"Editorial: We recommend John McCain for president". Dallas Morning News. 18 Oct. 2008 - "Americans want 18 Oct. 2008 - "Americans want change, yes, but banking on change alone is a risky proposition. Both Barack Obama and John McCain offer new deals to a tense, weary nation."
The climate is not "a changing".
More rain = more surface ice, Not depth. The antarctic is losing mass, But expanding in size cooborating my theory. Something to note for any voters: I accepted all his sources as fact, And built a justificable counter-argument within that framing. He has only disputed my sources and not provided substantial arguments of his own.
The climate is not "a changing".
A brief response My opponent has denied that his assertion about the IPCC being communists is irrelevant to the debate. He also clames I did not address this point. Obviously both these things are wrong, It is a red herring, And I addressed it when I called it such. If he'd like, He can attempt to justify why the IPCC has any bearing on whether global warming is real or not. I will not use the IPCC as a source because it appears to trigger him. He would like me to show and justify my arguments, Without doing so himself. I hope voters/viewers see through his clearly dishonest tactic and address the fact he didn't actually make an argument; he just stated something and assumed we would believe it's justifiable. The Anthropological Case for Global Warming I will argue that global warming is, Atleast in part, Being increased by anthropogenic activities. 1a. ) Carbon Dioxide levels have never been this high, In the course of over 400000 years. [1][2] 2a. ) Human activity has directly caused the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. [3] 3a. ) Atmospheric CO2 increases the global temperature. [3][4] C. 1; If these things are scientifically accurate, Humans must be causing global warming. The Geological Case for Global Warming This has very little to do with the cause, Only that it exists. 1b. ) Temperature on the Earth fluctuates. [5] 2b. ) Temperature on the Earth is currently rising rapidly. [6] C. 2; If these things are scientifically accurate, Global warming is true. Sources on my profile