Prioritising prevention hasn’t worked
Resolved: Adaptation should be the most urgent response to Climate Change.
Prioritising prevention hasn’t worked
Topic space view
Pro vs. con view
Topic space view
-
PRO -
CON Some of the required adaptations are impossible
Resolved: Adaptation should be the most urgent response to Climate Change.
Some of the required adaptations are impossible
-
PRO Nothing left to say i suppose, Vote Aff as my oppenent...
Developed Coutries have a moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Nothing left to say i suppose, Vote Aff as my oppenent hasnt showed up the last 2 rounds.
-
CON While developed countries are more capable of...
Developed countries have the greatest capacity to combat climate change.
While developed countries are more capable of contributing to combating global warming, their obligation to do so does not increase. The ease with which a party can accomplish a task does not determine its responsibility to do so.
-
PRO In the fall of 2015, several artists in the Caribbean...
The Dire Warnings of the United Nations’ Latest Climate-Change Report
In the fall of 2015, several artists in the Caribbean appeared in a film titled “1.5 Stay Alive,” featuring a series of homespun music videos. The name of the project referred to a campaign to limit the rise
-
PRO Since my opponent forfeited the previous round, extend my...
Developed countries have a moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Since my opponent forfeited the previous round, extend my arguments.
-
PRO Seeing that you have a rich source of information I can...
Is Human Activity an addition to increased Global Warming/Climate Change
Seeing that you have a rich source of information I can easily rebut the case. To address you examples that humans are different than dinosaurs. Not to mention the fact that during the dinosaurs time there was just 1 continent. So to end this debate my case has won because I have easily shown that humans harmful activity have increased Global Warming, you're entire case is built upon the facts that if the dinosaurs lived through it we can. Well that was a 165 million years ago buddy, Earth has changed. For these reasons this is why Pro has won this debate.
-
CON I have made many edits in Wikipedia and after about 7...
Reserved for FollowerofChrist: Climate change is real and a massive threat to humanity.
I just posted some information which gave you an opportunity to react to, rather than just letting you waffle on about subjects that I am not interested in or concerned about. Regardless, if you didn't post an argument in the first round that is your fault and not mine. You just wasted a valuable round, that's all. 2. My opponent keeps using Wikipedia references and seems to think that these are highly reputable and contain infallible information which can't be disputed or challenged. This is nonsense and a contradiction of his own authority fallacy theory. The Wikipedia website is just a collection of articles which could have been written by any random person. Its the editing that is the problem. I have made many edits in Wikipedia and after about 7 days my edits disappear and the original text comes back again. Thus, the site is managed by a bunch of conservative bureaucrats that hate new ideas or changes to old theories. Thus, if you are looking for exciting new ideas and scientific breakthroughs, then, you won't find any in Wikipedia. 3. People who are innocent don't run and hide in far off distant countries like China where they will be protected by the corrupted communist system. 4. My opponent has not refuted any of my arguments. I have shown that my opponent has supplied false and misleading information. I have shown that the concept of global warming is a fallacy. I have shown that Maurice Strong was a criminal. I have shown that the oceans are not rising. I have shown that CO2 doesn't cause temperature increases. I have shown how the IPCC deceives the public. Vote 1 Akhey !!!!!!!
-
PRO Mauna Loa This point, apart from being extremely...
Reserved for FollowerofChrist: Climate change is real and a massive threat to humanity.
Maurice You still haven't proved that he's a criminal, and all I have is that he slapped his name on a few things. Not the first instigator, not by a long shot. And even if he was a criminal, it doesn't disprove the science. Isaac Newton had people killed(he was in charge of killing counterfeiters), should we discredit all of his findings? This is nothing but an ad hominem. 2. Mauna Loa This point, apart from being extremely childish, is basically appeal to the stone. Also, see: https://skepticalscience.com...; 3. Sea levels. This is appeal to authority to the max, and you didn't even back up the authority that you gave him. And you still have clearly not even clicked on my sources. (#4 doesn't exist for some reason) 5. Appeal to authority. Jesus christ, I shouldn't have to link this to explain, but here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org...; Nota bene: when your argument begins with "Drrrrr????" and ends with "lol," you should probably rethink it. Aaaand then it's topped off with a juicy false equivalency. NOAA and IPCC are groups, do have peer review, and use the scientific process. Individuals are not subject to this. CONCLUSION I strongly urge a vote for affirmative(pro), as my opponent has not provided any real evidence, nor countered my own points, his arguments devolving into personal attacks, proof by assertion, and childish rhetoric.
-
PRO Extend refutation.
Resolved: Developed Countries have a moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change.
Extend refutation.
