• PRO

    I know the Rocky's speech very well and I understand...

    The new Pantene ad feminist ad "not sorry" is a terrible ad and a bad influence of feminism.

    My argument is that this campaign could effect feminism and society negatively. It is common to say sorry when you interrupt when someone is talking. Same for the woman entering the office. Pantene is trying to say that those women's personalities are subservient. But really they're just being considerate. I know the Rocky's speech very well and I understand sometimes you can't be sorry in life and have to stand up. But we are not talking about life and death, but basic daily manners. Such as saying good morning to your neighbors and such. I admire people who is strong and would stand up for themselves, but it doesn't mean that is an excuse not to apologize at times when necessary. It worries me that highschool or middle school females use this campaign as an excuse to forbid "sorry" in their sentences. It is not only senseless but gives a bad influence on our idea of basic manner.

  • CON

    Doctoral.............$1,352........$1,686...

    This house believes that the feminist movement should renounce the title of "Feminism".

    What Pro fails to realize is that the feminist movement is not over. Like I said last round (the one pro didn't forfeit) there are still places in the world where women have to fight for rights. This is still a women's movement, hence the name feminism. 1. Money: Pro says that when you control for a bunch of different factors, the gap shrinks. Well, if we look at earnings by degree level, men earn more every time. Doctoral.............$1,352........$1,686 Professional........$1,362.......$1,881 Master"s..............$1,127.......$1,488 Bachelor"s............$909..........$1,188 Associate"s..........$677............$886 no college............$543...........$710 [1] Since it takes about the same time to earn these degrees, you would expect each gender to make about the same. 2. Rape: pro says that women aren't raped more on average, but his follow-up argument has nothing to do with this. He's just saying that women rapists tend to rape weaker men. That doesn't mean women rape men more often. He also doesn't provide a source. 3. Middle East: he says that women are allowed to be educated in the middle east. I gave a source, he didn't, so... Since none of the issues I brought up have been shown to be equal between the sexes, it's obvious that this is still a women-centric issue, so the name is apt. Pro is wrong, so vote Con! 1. http://www.catalyst.org...

  • CON

    Studies have shown that when the name is removed from the...

    The west doesn't need feminism, it needs to move

    Thank you for the debate. There seems to be a general misunderstanding about how the pay differences occur. It is not simply the boss says Larry gets $20 an hour and Tina gets $10 an hour. It is more complex than that. The base salary for example can be negotiated. And it is legal. It just so happens that women tend to get paid less of a base salary than men. When the women ask for more, studies {and there are studies] show they are viewed negatively for asking for a higher starting base salary. If a man asks for more, he is usually viewed in a positive way. http://www.news.com.au... This is one of the ways that the pay gap occurs. As pointed out in my previous response, when women join an industry in huge numbers, the pay of everyone goes down. That is legal and it is linked to gender. There is also the issue of blind resumes. Studies have shown that when the name is removed from the resume {so one can't tell if the name indicates a woman or that the person is likely not to be white} those people are more likely to get called in for an interview. Actually the same resume, the only difference is that one is a man and one is a woman and the man will get called in more. This link is specific to science but it exists in other sectors. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com... I would remind people that there is also a promotional gap in every single industry even where there are far more women. I would also note that there are in fact studies that do factor in women taking time off work {post the recovery time} to have children, etc. {I would also point out that the fact that women are the ones that usually take extended time off and not the men is viewed by some as a gender issue as well. Yes, women do need time to recover after birth but women are the ones that usually stay home to look after the kids over the long-term. This is viewed as a gender bias by some. Why is it assumed that the woman should have to stay home because it is viewed as a woman's job. This impacts her ability to work outside of the house. I would point out that the link included in my previous response includes studies that a} show women being paid less than men for the same job, despite the law. B} The fact that some men work more hours has actually been taken into account but the studies still find a pay gap. If a person wants to believe there is no gap that is one thing but if a person claims that there are no studies showing that there is a gap that is simply not true. I do agree that women who choose to stay home or quit their jobs for their family can be criticised by some feminists. And I do think that is unfair. What I am curious to know is why there is such a resistance to accepting what studies do show? There is gap and there is still big discrimination. I would love to know why some {not all} men refuse to accept there is a gap? The problems facing men and women like poverty and unemployment are not caused because of Studies have shown that when the name is removed from the resume {so one can't tell if the name indicates a woman or that the person is likely not to be white} those people are more likely to get called in for an interview. Actually the same resume, the only difference is that one is a man and one is a woman and the man will get called in more. This link is specific to science but it exists in other sectors. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com... I would remind people that there is also a promotional gap in every single industry even where there are far more women. I would also note that there are in fact studies that do factor in women taking time off work {post the recovery time} to have children, etc. {I would also point out that the fact that women are the ones that usually take extended time off and not the men is viewed by some as a gender issue as well. Yes, women do need time to recover after birth but women are the ones that usually stay home to look after the kids over the long-term. This is viewed as a gender bias by some. Why is it assumed that the woman should have to stay home because it is viewed as a woman's job. This impacts her ability to work outside of the house. I would point out that the link included in my previous response includes studies that a} show women being paid less than men for the same job, despite the law. B} The fact that some men work more hours has actually been taken into account but the studies still find a pay gap. If a person wants to believe there is no gap that is one thing but if a person claims that there are no studies showing that there is a gap that is simply not true. I do agree that women who choose to stay home or quit their jobs for their family can be criticised by some feminists. And I do think that is unfair. What I am curious to know is why there is such a resistance to accepting what studies do show? There is gap and there is still big discrimination. I would love to know why some {not all} men refuse to accept there is a gap? The problems facing men and women like poverty and unemployment are not caused because of feminism for the record. I would also point out that the claim she made about American women being the most free and liberated in the world can be seriously questioned. The abortion debates would show otherwise. The lower level of women in higher positions compared to some other countries. The lower social mobility in America {for both men and women} is lower than some other countries. Therefore, I would disagree with the claim that women in the US are the most free and liberated.

  • PRO

    This is an important debate topic that can be sometimes...

    Feminism is necessary

    This is an important debate topic that can be sometimes difficult to discuss. I am here because I am a proud feminist and I am the head of my debate team so I am forming my arguments. Please be respectful. I know there are only 2000 characters available. That is because I believe this debate can be held without extremely long arguments. There are also multiple rounds so there will be a chance to say everything you want to say. Please keep in mind that this is meant to be a respectful debate. I'd like to thank whoever takes this debate ahead of time and say good luck :).