It encourages discipline
School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory
It encourages discipline
Pro vs. con view
Pro vs. con view
Topic space view
PRO
-
PRO -
PRO It contributes to the sense of school’s unity
School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory
It contributes to the sense of school’s unity
-
PRO Creates a sense of equality
School Uniforms Should Be Mandatory
Creates a sense of equality
-
PRO All my six debates I won, the opponent forfeited... :(...
School Uniforms Should not be Required
aw come on! I bet I will win again by forfeit Why do I always win by a bad way? All my six debates I won, the opponent forfeited... :( Just...just base the argument on the rest of the rounds. I want a fair fight!! However I do not concede. I still hold my points in the fact that within a federal law case, the parents lost, and the nation contradicts its belief in freedom of expression (And do NOT forfeit again my opponent, for I will not forgive you!) "Forfeit once, shame on me. Forfeit twice, shame on you. Forfeit three times, you lose for sure."--9spaceking's random quote
-
PRO You must be way too busy. ... Much better than that other...
School Uniforms Should not be Required
I am sorry. You must be way too busy. Unfortunately I doubt you will win, even if your argument is the strongest argument ever in DDO history. Nobody who has forfeited won me. You have to try harder next time. Good debate anyways. Much better than that other guy who didn't even try.
-
PRO It's unfortunate that this turned into a one-sided...
School uniforms are good
It's unfortunate that this turned into a one-sided argument. Thank you to everyone that took an interest in this debate.
-
PRO Since my opponent has chosen to forfeit this round, my...
School uniforms are good
Since my opponent has chosen to forfeit this round, my previous arguments stand firm. I await further debate.
-
PRO So we both have an equal number of rounds, I will also...
School uniforms are good
So we both have an equal number of rounds, I will also post my arguments in round 2.
-
PRO No, I liked it and awared the real significance of...
High school students should wear uniforms.
No, I liked it and awared the real significance of uniform and its purpose. I deem your idea about high price is wrong because of it is bought for the whole year may be for two years sometimes. From another side, it will be the real and hard puzzle to choose different clothes for each new day, it is obviously more expensive than an one-time school uniform. And one more reason to wear unform that people and other pupils will appreciate your internal world when you are in uniform and without any expensive clothes
-
PRO My opponent has PMed me, saying she doesn't have time....
School Uniforms Should not be Required
My opponent has PMed me, saying she doesn't have time. I understand, but nevertheless she has lost the debate due to her forfeit.
CON
-
CON kids shouldnt have to wear uniforms because uniforms are...
Should kids have to wear uniform in School
kids shouldnt have to wear uniforms because uniforms are expensive especially to unfornate families. parents have to spend more money on buying uniform just for kids to wear it to one place. parents also have to pay for street clothes too.
-
CON It would seem that my opponent has missed another round....
Mandatory School Uniforms are beneficial to schooling
It would seem that my opponent has missed another round. I believe that my points still stand.
-
CON Alas, my opponent has been unable to provide another...
Mandatory School Uniforms are beneficial to schooling
Alas, my opponent has been unable to provide another response. I do assume that this is because of external factors but at the same time I also urge voters to vote on what they have seen, essentially what we have is an argument and a refutation.
-
CON In honour of this, and also seeing as I made the mistake...
Mandatory School Uniforms are beneficial to schooling
My opponent's luck has failed him and the timer ran out before he could post his reply. In honour of this, and also seeing as I made the mistake of posting criticisms rather than initial arguments, we shall call it even and (assuming my opponent agrees) debate back and forth from now on, I may introduce several new points during round four but round five will remain a matter of final defenses and reiterations with no new points. Any criticisms of my opponent's arguments may be found in round 2.
-
CON Argument #3: Logically, a parent would not immediately...
School Uniforms Should Not Be Required in Schools
Rebuttal to my opponent"s rebuttal: Argument #1: My opponent has conceded to the correctness of my assertion, to the inaccuracy of her argument. My opponent has also made a claim""barely any bullies bully people on what they wear.""without any concrete evidence. Argument #2: My opponent has once more, agreed to my statement, that children find many other ways to express themselves, mean while making an assertion: "but most people express themselves the most they dress with the different colors and styles." Without any substantial evidence to enforce her assertion. Argument #3: Logically, a parent would not immediately rush to the rescue of their child, in the case of an extreme natural disaster"even if they were to do so, they would be restricted outside of the danger zone, until paramedics or other such emergency crew extracted all children from the destruction. In that event, recognition of the student would not require clothing, because parent and or guardian would be given permission to identify the wounded or past. I will concede though, that there are some people out there, who will disregard all procedures, and attempt to rush to their child"s defense and rescue; in that case, the clothing would provide a point of approach for the adult"in this case though, more children"s lives would be put at risk, because an untrained person is attempting to extract a body from ruble. Argument #4: My opponent is drawing at straws, this argument is completely unnecessary, and hurts my opponent"s case. End of Rebuttal Conduct: My opponents conduct was rather impressive, considering the amount of scrutiny and rejections to her arguments that I put her threw. I was even impressed by the way she handled my mistake upon her gender. I give her many props for that. SNG: I am mostly blind, from what I could tell (with my screen reader program doing the reading,) her spelling was relatively flawless; however, her sentence stricter did not very much. Over all though, I did not have any problems interpreting what she was trying to say. Arguments: For the most part, her arguments were well put together. There was a few issues, covered in my rebuttals; not, in any way her fault. When there is a bit of biased involved, emotions tend to override what little judgment granted to us as humans. Sources: Her first set of sources were well put together, and when asked for what she had referred to, she provided it for me. I would recommend to my opponent to post at the bottom a link, so the voters in her future debates can look at the credibility of her source. Only one other flaw that I could detect. My opponent brought in a bit of statistics. For anyone who has taken a statistics course at the university or college level, you know that voluntary response poles are completely inaccurate. They lack perfect randomization, and the sample pool is usually relatively low. Not to mention, but the pole would naturally retain a bit of response biased"those who wish to impress their peers"and under coverage biased"not everyone might have been asked: jocks, nerds, geeks, etc. I would strongly advise my opponent to stay away from poles that she self-conducts, unless she is using a stratified sampling process with a random number table. Closing statements: I would like to thank my opponent for the wonderful debate. I would also like to oppologize to my opponent for referring to her by the wrong gender, during round two. I will not advise the voters to vote for either Con, or pro"if you have read each round you will know who to vote for. I wish the best to you all, and now I will bid you adieu
-
CON Right - just another drive by debate.
schools should not have school uniforms
Right - just another drive by debate.
-
CON vote neg
Kids should wear school uniforms
vote neg
-
CON my opponent has given up. Please vote for me!
Kids should wear school uniforms
my opponent has given up. Please vote for me!
-
CON Well if you think about it anyone could get inside...
All Schools Need Uniforms
There's something called attendance. Well if you think about it anyone could get inside uniform school anytime they want but if they don't want that to happen they need to have security. Expressing themselves is called art and beauty. Well if you think about it anyone could get inside uniform school anytime they want but if they don't want that to happen they need to have security. Expressing themselves is called art and beauty. School is actually for people to meet friends and work together and learning is actually the preparation for work, and I don't see why can't they wear anything they want (appropriate) for school.
-
CON I am not sure what my opponent's point was with trying to...
# SHORTER SCHOOL HOURS# YES OR NO (please click yes)
I must disagree. Teachers give us homework to sharpen our skills with the topic we learned. To help us understand the lesson. That is why they give us homework. Because they do not have time to make sure that they have the lesson well taught and well learned for everyone. With my prior example, the teacher can make sure that everyone understands the material that is being taught. I am not sure what my opponent's point was with trying to learn 4 lessons of physics in around 30 minutes was. If he is being sarcastic I have no idea. Long periods are beneficial to society as well as the education system as a whole. And actually, let us see what happens to bully rates when the school hours increase. I am willing to bet that they will decrease. The answer to that is very simple when you look at the root cause for bullying. Why does it occur? If you increase school hours, and they reduce stress on the bully, he will not need to hurt a kid to express himself from all the stress he is under. I am not saying to increase the amount of time outside of class. I am saying to increase the amount of time in class, so that students can have a better chance of learning the material. Less wearing I am not sure what my opponent's point was with trying to learn 4 lessons of physics in around 30 minutes was. If he is being sarcastic I have no idea. Long periods are beneficial to society as well as the education system as a whole. And actually, let us see what happens to bully rates when the school hours increase. I am willing to bet that they will decrease. The answer to that is very simple when you look at the root cause for bullying. Why does it occur? If you increase school hours, and they reduce stress on the bully, he will not need to hurt a kid to express himself from all the stress he is under. I am not saying to increase the amount of time outside of class. I am saying to increase the amount of time in class, so that students can have a better chance of learning the material. Less wearing uniforms? This is not true for all schools. Thus, that is a school topic for a debate, not a nation-wide topic such as the school hours. Thanks for the debate. Good job! You made some good points in the debate. Although, the insults were a little much. And since you like Halo, check out the debate with me on the topic Battlefield takes more skill than Halo! Ill cya round!
