• PRO

    Through education, children will acquire the skills and...

    Requiring school attendance allows welfare to be the hand-up that it is meant to be, and keep children out of crime.

    In the US, girls who grow up in families receiving welfare handouts are 3 times more likely to receive welfare themselves within three years of having their first child than girls who's families were never on welfare1. Children living in poverty were 2 times more likely to have grade repetition and drop out of high school and 3.1 times more likely to have children out of wedlock as teenagers2. They are 2.2 times more likely to experience violent crimes. Children of welfare recipients are more likely to end up on welfare themselves. Welfare should be a hand up, not a handout that leads to dependency on the state. It is the latter if we are only leading people to fall into the same trap as their parents. Education is the way to break the vicious cycle. Through education, children will acquire the skills and qualifications they need in order to obtain gainful employment once they reach adulthood, and overcome their condition. In the developing world, primary education has proven to reduce AIDS incidences, improve health, increase productivity and contribute to economic growth3. School can empower children, and give them guidance and hope that they may not receive at home. Getting kids in school is the first step to equipping them with the skills to better their situations, and if encouraged by their parents they might consider scholarships to college or vocational school. The program does not guarantee this for all, but it is likely more effective than the leaving parents with no incentive to push their children. Benefits are supposed to promote the welfare of both parents and children. One of the best ways to ensure that welfare payments are actually benefiting children is to make sure they're going to school. This is simply providing parents with an extra incentive to do the right thing for their children and become more vested in their kids' education. 1 Family Facts, "A Closer Look at Welfare", [Accessed July 21, 2011].  2Duncan, Greg and Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (2000), "Family Poverty, Welfare Reform, and Child Development", Child Development, [Accessed July 21, 2011] 3http World Bank, "Facts about Primary Education",[Accessed July 21, 2011].

  • PRO

    But it was only a minute afterwards that one of the...

    Hardly Fair: A Silly School Dress Code Debate

    Just a short while ago, I was innocently sitting in the cafeteria eating the excruciating and sorry excuse for a burger, when out of nowhere I expirienced a heat wave course through me. So in response, I took off my jacket for a moment and continued ingesting the disgusting meal. I wore beneath my jacket a light-blue shirt, which barely showed my, ehem, bra straps. But it was only a minute afterwards that one of the supervisors patrolling the cafeteria was on my back, demanding that I put my jacket back on. I did so with no argument, but as the supervisor walked away, a thought occured to me. What makes it justified for most girls to wear these short-shorts and very mini-mini skirts that barely conceal what so desperately should be concealed, but if another girl's bra-strap shows a little, it's to be rebuked? Why can some girls go through the day unprovoked about their wild dyed-black hair with pink and red and blue streaks throughout but a boy with slight facial hair is given a crappy disposable razor and a helping of shame and sent to the restroom to take care of that problem? Why doesn't anyone get onto the boys wearing hats with marajuana(sp?) leaves on the front and alchohol references all over a black t-shirt? If the But it was only a minute afterwards that one of the supervisors patrolling the cafeteria was on my back, demanding that I put my jacket back on. I did so with no argument, but as the supervisor walked away, a thought occured to me. What makes it justified for most girls to wear these short-shorts and very mini-mini skirts that barely conceal what so desperately should be concealed, but if another girl's bra-strap shows a little, it's to be rebuked? Why can some girls go through the day unprovoked about their wild dyed-black hair with pink and red and blue streaks throughout but a boy with slight facial hair is given a crappy disposable razor and a helping of shame and sent to the restroom to take care of that problem? Why doesn't anyone get onto the boys wearing hats with marajuana(sp?) leaves on the front and alchohol references all over a black t-shirt? If the What makes it justified for most girls to wear these short-shorts and very mini-mini skirts that barely conceal what so desperately should be concealed, but if another girl's bra-strap shows a little, it's to be rebuked? Why can some girls go through the day unprovoked about their wild dyed-black hair with pink and red and blue streaks throughout but a boy with slight facial hair is given a crappy disposable razor and a helping of shame and sent to the restroom to take care of that problem? Why doesn't anyone get onto the boys wearing hats with marajuana(sp?) leaves on the front and alchohol references all over a black t-shirt? If the school is going to make a dress code, than they should make a better effort to enforce it, shouldn't they? No one should be able to slip through the cracks.

  • PRO

    I have been feeling unwell for the past couple of days,...

    School Uniform Should be Compulsory

    Hi all, Pro here. I have been feeling unwell for the past couple of days, Is it okay if both myself and my opponent 'skip' this round (to even out the amount of rounds we participate in), Then in Round 4 we both provide our final rebuttals/arguments? Sorry for the inconvenience,

  • PRO

    Yes that is true but you completely missunderstand my...

    Children should only have to wear uniform on school event(when vistors come, sports days)

    Yes that is true but you completely missunderstand my point as my point was when friday NOT thursday comes mothers would wash the uniform yes but with the money saved will be used to buy school lunches and new uniform for the oldest child.

  • CON

    My opponent said band should be cut out and students can...

    Public Schools Should not Fund School Bands.

    My opponent said funding band is unconstitutional and said the Federal Government has no right funding band. He got this idea from the Article 1 Section 8 which he said whatever is not listed in the Article is not allowed to be funded. In Article 1 Section 8 (http://www.usconstitution.net......) states what Power the Congress can do. The Federal Goverment does not have the power to fund schools but the State goverment those. Schools are not directly funded by the Federal goverment, the money is given to the States and the States distribute the money umong the distrincts[1]. If it was uncontitutional to fund band, then we would not be having this debate right now. My opponent said band should be cut out and students can just play at home. The consiqusies with playing music on your own time and not having band at school is the fact the student does not have a band to play with. Playing in with a band helps students music skills in ways playing by your self or with a few friends could not do. While playing in the band students have to listen to each other to know how loud or soft to play or what tempo to play. Also, if their no band for a student play for a extracurricular activity, their no chance for the student to list this on their college application. Again from my previous argument, partcipanting in extracurricrlar activties shows colleges that you can manage your time, maintain long time commentment, and show they can make contribution for something[2]. Schools across the country are cutting teachers in order to keep their budgets while making class room sizes larger. If students are having old times in classes because the classes are larger than students can do the same thing my opponent said about playing your instrument home. Students can hire toturs in their spare time and study harder and it could help students prepare for colleges where some classes with over a hundred students. My conclusion for why public schools should fund band is 1. students can recive schoalorships to play in band in college 2. playing an instrument increases people intellengents 3. students can take their musical talents and become an muscian to make their living 4. performing in band makes your college application look better a improve your chances getting into college [1] http://www2.ed.gov...... [2]http://www.collegeboard.com......

  • CON

    Band help students more mentally than other activities...

    Public Schools Should not Fund School Bands.

    Reasons not to cut funding for band are provide students scholarships to college, one of the more popular extracurricular activities, teach students a talent they can use in the real world to get a job to make a living, and even make students smarter. Band is costly but schools do not fund all the cost to run a band. Some bands make students pay to get in and many fundraisers are use to raise money to supply the band needs. Band is not just a hobby, it is one of the many extracurricular activities (activities performed by students that fall outside the realm of the normal curriculum of school or university education[2]) most schools provide. Band is one of the more popular extracurricular activities in public schools today. Hundreds of students participate in this activity. Out of all the other extracurricular activities why does band have to be the one cut in funding. I know schools can need more teachers and supplies but band helps students become more smarter in core classes. Band help students more mentally than other activities like sports or cheer leading. Studies at the University of Sarasota and East Texas State University both found links between the number of years of band instruction and significantly improved academic achievement as measured by standardized math, science and language tests (3). In this link (http://oakleafband.com...) study shows music make brain grow, show students get higher SAT scores with a music background, and it raises students math conceptual scores. The reason why schools fund band it is not because so they can teach students how to play a noise maker but it help students develop their minds so they can become smarter. Another reason why band should be funded because students can use these opportunity to gain a scholarship to college. A scholarship that can help someone advance their education to set them up for the best possible spot to get a good career. My opponent opinion is that it is very hard to make a living off playing a musical instrument. But the fact is, people can make a living off their musical talents. There are many jobs out there where someone can make a living off playing a instrument. Musicians can find jobs at churches, in the entertainment industry, music teacher, or join the military band where they can make a salary from $24,605 - $65,693 (1). Becoming one of these occupations is not easy nor is it any easier to become any other occupation. For any one who wants to work in their preferred career has to work very hard. Just like athletics have to practice to become a professional or a student studying hard to become an engineer, musicians have to practice and study and get a degree to become successful. (1) http://www.payscale.com... (2)http://en.wikipedia.org... (3)http://oakleafband.com...