I thank CON for his gracious concession.
Feminism creates pseudo problems and is nowhere near as relevant as Feminists claim it is
I thank CON for his gracious concession.
Feminism creates pseudo problems and is nowhere near as relevant as Feminists claim it is
I thank CON for his gracious concession.
Feminism in society and what is useful for,Rape Cultures existence, Wage Gaps existence
My opponent has failed to post a rebuttal, so I won't post one. Good bye.
Feminism is a flawed ideology and has made women much more miserable
If you have a problem with what I meant, That's not my problem. If people misunderstood what George Ford meant in the presidential debate, Then it's their problem, Not his. So sorry I offended you with my FACTS, But then again FACTS don't care about your FEELINGS. Seriously, Look up Ben Shapiro. Let me give out some FACTS: https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=byn0fBCVeHA https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=mOqWK7qlg18 https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=Ir4Ltgj4o84 https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=kAxUDMy1oUw https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=MNH0bmYT7os https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=jmeTnVywvwU https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=5cIvH-iZZfA&t=906s https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=wSJ6dZBdVvY https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=K6t61UzVg_k https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=z6TBa3ssQNs https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=ngeiKVA3w10 https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=oFdlhiEHHmU&t=307s https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=LdeKryUnZo4 https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=kUGu7UCPT7w&t=3s https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=8GvwYOfHXMM https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=kn9yaNSvsRE https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=dRSKykYgLEs https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=rz3rJxZ2uwg Wanna see more, Ralph? There are tons and tons more, Ralph. These are not isolated incidents. Go watch the Tucker Carlson show, Ben Shapiro's speeches or Milo Yiannopoulos. Go watch the Slut marches and watch how they abuse and spit on conservative journalists like Owen Shroyer. If you would do a little research of your own, You will find whatever I have said is true. Most of the feminists subscribe to this logic and as I said, Want equality for everything fun. Don't start that stupid argument with me, Ralph. There is no way of proving all feminists are radicals just as there is no way of proving that all Bill Clinton supporters are rape sympathizers. You can only talk keeping the majority in mind. My argument is not garbage as much as your action of casually dismissing everything is. The ball's in your court.
Feminism is a flawed ideology and has made women much more miserable
Yeah, Wonderful logic you have. Anyone better than you is a noob. At least, I don't blabber around with words picked out of the dictionary and post actual proof. I don't need to read their minds to understand their ideology, Ralph. I don't need to go to the Sun to know that it is hot. I don't need to take out the tire of a car and check its air content to confirm that it is a car, I know it is by looking at it. Would you say that all Democrats are rapists just because Bill Clinton was one? Prove to me that all feminists believe in equality, Nothing more, Nothing less. You can't, That's why you kept on blabbering and being dismissive, While I posted actual proof. There are tons and tons more, You just need to do some actual work and research. I just presented more than 10 videos with scores of examples. With just a little more research, You will find there are thousands of them. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that they need my help. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that in most families, Men earn the money, Which in turn buys the food which the man, Woman and the kids eat. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that in the unlikely event when I and a woman is on a Titanic, The woman gets to leave with the kids on a lifeboat. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that if a house is on fire, The woman gets to leave with the kids first. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that whenever there is a hostage situation, The first demands are always to let the women and the children go, As if the bullets don't hurt men. Equality of women does not mean that I must not point out the fact that feminists go around praising Bill Clinton, While on the other hand, Calling Harvey Weinstein a pig. Equality of women does not mean that I must pretend to like it when feminists say breastfeeding is not natural to them. Equality of women does not mean that I must pretend that there is a rape culture while there is none. Equality of women does not mean that I should not use the word 'lady' among others because it is offensive to feminists. Equality of women does not mean that I should campaign for equal wages paid to women even if they will choose to get in the professions of their choice and while whisking away on maternity leave. Sometimes for a year. Finally, And most importantly, Equality of women does not mean that I must pretend that I am a male, Chauvinistic pig and have male privilege just because I am male. Women are already equal to men, They just want to be higher up than men. Your frivolous attitude proves that your greatest weapon is dismissing others' argument without a shred of statistics or evidence. You have no evidence or facts to back you up and the only thing you can do is call others a noob if they demolish your argument with facts. The ball's in your court. I SUGGEST to actually put forward some facts instead of being dismissive and thinking that you have a very high knowledge, Which apparently, You do not.
2nd wave and 3rd wave/modern feminism is harmful and should not exist.
The argument I posted in the last round was sited, therefor not plagiarized. Con has not provided any evidence to prove my claims wrong, only stating false allegations against my claims, which I have proved fully. Vote for the one that actually has arguments, Pro/me.
Third-wave feminism is about misandry and has nothing to do with gender equality
This round is for acceptance Round 2 is opening arguments Round 3 is rebuttal Round 4 is rebuttal to opponent's rebuttal Round 5 is closing Good Luck :)
Modern Feminism (3rd/4th Wave) is Unnecessary as well as Unfair to Men.
Hello. This was brought on by seeing an article... http://www.independent.co.uk... The rules are simple R1. Acceptance R2. Arguments R3. Rebuttals for R2. arguments. R4. Conclusions I am not going to exclude more than two things. One being reproductive "rights" and the other being rape rates. Sexual harassment/groping is fair game. I will be using sources from http://www.debate.org... as well as other sources. Voting is open voting, select winner. Thank you. Enjoy the debate
Modern Feminism (3rd/4th Wave) is Unnecessary as well as Unfair to Men.
Hello. Thank you for accepting and I wish you luck. Transportation Segregation I firstly would like to say that women are now advocating for their own transport "for protection from men". Replace women with "whites" and men with "blacks" and we have the sentiment of segregated America. In the interest of women they criminalize men. http://www.independent.co.uk... Written by a feminist. Wage Gap So, feminists LOVE the wage gap. They will go on and on about it. I found a website that lists the reasons for the wage gap, and a majority of it is either occupational or industrial. the breakdown is as follows -6.5% is educational. With women getting more education, the wage gap went down. 41.1% is undetermined. This means it could be, well, anything. This may look bad on my argument, but wait. 27.4% is occupational choice. Translation? 27.4% of the wage gap is ALL YOUR FAULT. 29.1% is industry. 10.5 is labor experience. 3.5% is union status. Translation? They don't negotiate pay. 2.4% is race or ethnicity. This is not the fault of you being a woman, the fault of your skin color. This is unfair, but not the fault of two X chromosomes. Over half of the wage gap is the fault of the women. https://www.americanprogress.org... Domestic Abuse Domestic abuse is more often than not caused by women against men. Social experiments demonstrate the issues with fighting back or the man being attacked and not being helped, while the woman is helped instantly. Video with statistics and facts on domestic abuse by a renowned psychologist. To summarize the point of these videos, in domestic violence, men under report their abuse. This is due to social pressures against hurting a woman. This proves the point that if a man is abused by his wife/girlfriend, he is statistically less likely to report said abuse. Allow me to quote the psychiatrist who made one of these videos. "I want to share my reasons for not breaking up with my wife though she repeatedly physically attacked me throughout our marriage. We had a 5 year old daughter, to whom she was inattentive. I thought I could be the attentive parent. My wife was jealous that our daughter "liked" me better than her. One day, my wife attacked me with a 2x4 while I was sleeping. I left the house so she could cool off, but when I got back, my wife had called the police and accused me of beating her. She even had the bruises to prove it, even though I had only held her back and run away as soon as possible. She filed for divorce and won sole custody of our child. I was a Psychologist, but because of my "violent nature", the court never allowed me to ever see my daughter privately again. She is now 23 and hates and fears me because she believes her mother's story about me. Getting back to my original point, I stayed to protect my daughter's emotional development, and because I knew that if we ever got divorced, I would never be allowed to have a close relationship with my daughter"- Stefan Molyneux, respected psychiatrist. (Note- the last two paragraphs are from my other debate, linked in R1) Penal System Women can commit the same crimes as a man, and receive lighter sentences. http://www.ifeminists.com... http://www.huffingtonpost.com... https://creativedestruction.wordpress.com... Two of those are news reports and one is from a feminist site. Women in Politics Women are underrepresented in politics. This is not the result of misogyny, but because fewer think about going into politics. And fewer of those actually DO. http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
Feminism equality has been achieved these are just women looking for handouts
I accept. I wish my oponent luck and hope that we can engage in an educational debate.
Feminism equality has been achieved these are just women looking for handouts
Summary: The con has failed to provide evidence throughout the entire debate. They have presented analytics and offered no evidence that their claims are true. The pro has offered evidence for every point, using sources to back up their claims and disproving the cons claim. In terms of the modified resolution, the con has not actually disproven that women cannot serve in parts of the military. The pro has even proven that they want to take the actual SEAL test. The cons only arguements are their personal beliefs, something that is not valid against actual evidence. Therefore, the pro can see no other ballot than the affirmative case. As a note, why am I on the pro side? The resolution and 1AC say two very separate things.
Feminism equality has been achieved these are just women looking for handouts
Round 1is acceptance round 2-4 is the actual debate My opponent will try to argue that equality has not been achieved. Good Luck, youll need it. The voting process is to be determined on who has the best debate not off of your opinions on the actual debate, thats the whole reason that this site was made.
Modern-Day Feminism could very well be a lost cause. (No order of argument/ freestyle debate)
Please extend.
Modern-Day Feminism could very well be a lost cause. (No order of argument/ freestyle debate)
An ancient Roman walked into a bar, held up two fingers and said "I'd like five beers."
Modern-Day Feminism could very well be a lost cause. (No order of argument/ freestyle debate)
Thanks for the debate!
Modern-Day Feminism could very well be a lost cause. (No order of argument/ freestyle debate)
Well, thanks for the great debate topic and the compliment! I definitely didn't mean to make you feel bad, but if I did I'm quite sorry. Feel free to message me for a debate anytime!
Feminism promotes an unnatural equality between the sexes. There is nothing wrong with sex-role dif...
Women have shown that they are just as capable as men of playing a central role in public life; men have shown that they are just as capable as women of looking after the house and bringing up children. Given this, the suggestion that the male/female public/private divide is biological, natural and right looks somewhat suspect. Feminists point out that the roles traditionally accorded to men are those which - by virtue of being public - involve the widest exercise of political power and influence, and argue that claiming that this is natural and inevitable is an effective way of naturalising male power over women. Claims that motherhood is more fulfilling for women than career success operate as criticisms of women who choose not to have children, and are therefore self-fulfilling prophecies; they tell us nothing about what women are really best at.
Official March Beginner's Tournament 2016 Round 2: Feminism is Beneficial to the Modern World.
Thanks to Nivek for the debate!
Official March Beginner's Tournament 2016 Round 2: Feminism is Beneficial to the Modern World.
I accept, and look forward to the debate!
Second-wave and third-wave feminism have, all in all, detrimentally affected the USA.
Here we are once again, dear reader. Thank you for sticking with me through what is now my fourth debate to end in forfeits (out of only five, I might add). I'm beginning to feel like someone is trying to tell me something here. Well, on to the business at hand. I believe that, if nothing else, I have clearly done a better job of presenting my position than Pro has. In fact, Pro has made no attempt to argue anything at all. Just imagine that this was the riveting debate it could have been. Think of all the brilliant arguments that I made in this alternate reality where InVinoVeritas attempted to present his case. Think of all the logical fallacies I pointed out, and how I was able to redirect his argument back to show that he was proving my case for me. Just think of the wonderful laughs you could have had with the sharp wit I used to cut through his faulty syllogisms. I'm terribly sorry we couldn't experience that together, my dear readers. Next time, I hope. Thanks for reading.
Second-wave and third-wave feminism have, all in all, detrimentally affected the USA.
This is becomming an all too familiar feeling on this site, unfortunately. Feels a bit as if I'm fulfilling dinner reservations even though my date cancelled. I will see you again in 72 hours, I suppose.