• CON

    Point 2: I. ... Sources: 1-...

    Feminism fights to harm men.

    Rebuttal to Third Argument: Point 1: I. My opponent has simply pasted sources without describing the qualities or as to how they redirect back into their argument. II. My opponent has yet again simply copy/pasted directly from this source.[1] III. My opponent has yet to answer to any of my counter arguments, or provide how the ideology of feminism is not centered around equality of the sexes. C: Feminism has yet to be shown (in this argument) that it 'fights to harm men', meaning the burden of proof has not been fulfilled. Also, if you acknowledge that there are feminists that 'want true equality' then you are conceding your argument. Point 2: I. 'Feminist' A fights to harm men, while 'Feminist' B fights for gender equality. II. A 'feminist' is, by definition, 'a person who supports feminism'. III. Feminism is, by definition, the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.[2] C: Feminist B is by definition not a feminist, whereas Feminist A by definition is a feminist. Point 3: I. My opponent's claim is that 'Feminism fights to harm men'. II. Feminism is composed of individuals that fight for gender equality, not female supremacy. C: Feminism does not fight to harm men, thus my opponent's claim is false. Sources: 1- http://anti-feminism-pro-equality.tumblr.com... 2- http://dictionary.reference.com...