args

Mandatory School Uniforms are beneficial to schooling

I realize now that the argument I wanted to use for my previous shool uniform debate doesn't actually apply under my resolution. So rather than go through the awkwardness of saying that in the debate and hoping for a tie, I decided to create a new resolution to boost the number of debates I participate in during my membership. Resolved: Mandatory School Uniforms are beneficial to schooling Now has come the time for definitions to be had: Mandatory: necessary, compulsory School Uniforms: outfits mandated by the school to apply to all same-gendered students alike, that is unique to each school. Beneficial: do more good than harm Schooling: the act of learning from a school system's curriculum. This can take multiple different forms, whether social or academic. The first round shall be for acceptance by my opponent. Second round shall be for case positions only, meaning my opponent may not refute my case during that round. From there, all arguments, whether refutation or reconstruction, are valid and permissible. I merely ask that the final round include no new arguments. The burden of proof for this debate will be shared between myself and my opponent. I must defend a case where the uniforms are beneficial and my opponent must advocate for a case proving that they are, indeed, detrimental. I now await an opponent.