Not only that, but Pro effectively conceded the debate by...
New Western Feminism is pointless and oppresive.
Resolution: Pro has undertaken to prove that feminism is 1. "pointless," 2. "focuses only on the supremacy of women," and 3. "oppresses the right of freedom of speech." Pro must establish all three points to win this debate, but Pro failed to establish any of them. Not only that, but Pro effectively conceded the debate by establishing that the Equality Canada feminist group is concerned with advancing "education, gender equality, reason and science," "collaboration between groups that discuss gender equality," "consciousness raising activities, to do with equality," and "the taboo subjects of gender equality." (Emphasis added.) We now enter the final round, in which new arguments are not to be entertained. Pro should not introduce new arguments; if he does introduce new arguments, voters should ignore them. Therefore, all seven points should go to Con: S&G for obvious reasons. Conduct because Pro tried to shift the burden of proof, and because Pro forfeited a round. Persuasion because (1) Pro failed to establish any of the three points that he undertook to establish, (2) because---even though it was not necessary since Pro had the burden of proof---Con established that two of those points were false, and (3) because Pro himself established (with his Equity Canada agument) that two of his points were false. Sources for obvious reasons.