• PRO

    You do not need a unbalanced diversion to solve an...

    Feminism should not have been created in the beginning.

    Had it not been for feminism the status quo for women would have been maintained. What exactly is the status quo. You do not need a unbalanced diversion to solve an unbalanced way of life. Look at martin Luther king junior for example. He did not believe it was about blacks but he believed it was about blacks and whites. So what is stopping us today with racism. The fact that people believe it's one side. Feminism did a lot that I do not take for granted but gender equality would have done more. The issue of feminism might say it is about power structure in the beginning but in many first world countries you can see it's about more so sexism. A unhealthy view of equality between men and women. When you start with something the best way to end with the best results is to tackle all of the issues instead of one. Of course there might be some issues at that time that are more important but does it really need to be pointed out or just solved? It's possible for feminism to be replaced with a more gender neutral definition and view of equality. It would have still made me people aware unequal differences between men and women. Unequal rights. I'm not saying feminism is horrible but I'm saying it is to concentrated on women. As in the definition and the word itself. Women had no equal rights but is feminism the best solution or just a solution that got popular?