args

Modern Feminism (3rd/4th Wave) is Unnecessary as well as Unfair to Men.

Pro: "My opponent argued on a platform of Islamophobia." Nope. I'm not Islamophobic. My family are all Muslims. I'm a truth lover. Pro: "used biased sources" Such as ABC News, Wikipedia, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia again Huffington Post...2 are sources that Pro himself used. * Pro: "He also willingly argues only Islamic countries to avoid the issue." Nepal is 81% Hindu. 9% are Buddhists. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... * Pro: "Rape was labeled untouchable and he violated this rule." Note: Pro just used rape in this debate. Pro's definition of rules was unclear and ambiguous even according to someone in the comments section. And I quote: "I am not going to exclude more than two things." "One being reproductive "rights" and the other being rape rates. Sexual harassment/groping is fair game." * Pro: "there was an Afghan queen." Who was not voted for. She was also the wife of King Amanullah Khan and under his authority which is a false dichotomy by ommiting information by Pro. She also "studied in Syria, learning Western and modern values there, which would influence her future actions and beliefs," according to Wikipedia, and showing an example of Western "One being reproductive "rights" and the other being rape rates. Sexual harassment/groping is fair game." * Pro: "there was an Afghan queen." Who was not voted for. She was also the wife of King Amanullah Khan and under his authority which is a false dichotomy by ommiting information by Pro. She also "studied in Syria, learning Western and modern values there, which would influence her future actions and beliefs," according to Wikipedia, and showing an example of Western feminism affecting the mindset of those from other cultures. https://en.m.wikipedia.org... * Pro: "I firstly would like to say that women are now advocating for their own transport "for protection from men." And isn't being taken seriously in America because it has not been successful in other countries, and it is considered "discriminatory towards men." http://www.telegraph.co.uk... http://m.huffpost.com... * Third and Fourth wave feminism are protected by freedom of speech. It is also protected by the seperation of church and state, like it or not. http://www.spiked-online.com... https://en.m.wikipedia.org... * Pro: "Domestic abuse is more often than not caused by women against men." Pro used Youtube as their only source on this point. Nevertheless, In the debate about violence, men more often side with violence than women do. -"Whether it is in acts of violence such as rape or murder, or violence such as rioting, gang murders or war, men play a role that far exceeds that of women. Women are more likely to be the victims, rather the perpetrators, of violent crime." https://disorderedworld.com... * Pro: "To summarize the point of these videos, in domestic violence, men under report their abuse." Then how does anyone know they are under reporting something they never report? * Pro: "One day, my wife attacked me with a 2x4 while I was sleeping." Don't date or marry crazy females. * Pro: "Women can commit the same crimes as a man, and receive lighter sentences." Notice the word "can". Men also "can" receive lighter sentences than women. * Pro: "Feminism in the West is an overzealous belief that will not stop until women get their turn at oppressing men." Pro is stating an opinion and making a prediction, not stating a fact. * I finish by quoting Pro. Pro: "Well this concludes the debate. Now I am going to criticize my opponent's argument. No offence, I'd do it to my own mother to win an argument."