Moreover, I am running a specific plan that I would like...
Hate Speech Should Not Be Protected Under Freedom of Speech
Hi! I am personally for the freedom of speech protecting hate speech, but as I did a parliamentary debate on this topic, I wanted to try my case against someone. Moreover, I am running a specific plan that I would like to test its efficacy. This is my first real debate on this site, so forgive me for basic errors I make. Format should go like this Round 1- prop initiates and lays out definitions, opp accepts and provides any additional clarifications Round 2- Pro arguments, Con-ref and arguments Round 3- Pro ref and conclusion, con- conclusion Definitions: Hate Speech- speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits. (American Bar Association) Freedom of Speech- the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations... guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions. (Merriam Webster Dictionary) Protect- To ensure the ability to speak in manner discussed in debate (hate speech) without legal repercussions. Thanks!