args

School Uniforms Shouldn't Be Required

I thank 9spaceking for his response and for instigating this excellent debate. I should like to remind all that since 9spaceking instigated this debate he chose the resolution and the Proposition position himself. As such I did not force him into accepting the BoP, he put the BoP on himself. I once more cite the Latin rule: "Onus probandi incumbet ei qui deciet, non ei qui negat." With that in the clear, let us now begin! 1. My opponent has conceded this. 2. My opponent has conceded this. 3. He did not summarize what negative impacts and why these negative impacts occured. If his argument bases itself solely on the expression argument he has himself conceded it earlier and therefore this point becomes moot. Also I have tried many times, the page fails to display. 4. He makes a positive claim, which seems quite trollish. In essence discipline is needed because schools help to prepare children for the future, where they will have to follow a set of laws, such as that of a country. A school teaches them all this. Also by raising this point 9spaceking concedes that If his argument bases itself solely on the expression argument he has himself conceded it earlier and therefore this point becomes moot. Also I have tried many times, the page fails to display. 4. He makes a positive claim, which seems quite trollish. In essence discipline is needed because schools help to prepare children for the future, where they will have to follow a set of laws, such as that of a country. A school teaches them all this. Also by raising this point 9spaceking concedes that uniforms help in discipline. 5. I do not have access to source 3, also it is a purely American source and American law cannot be applied to other countries. 6. My opponent has conceded this. 7. My opponent has conceded this. 8(a). Let me start by clarifying that according to the rules you placed the BoP on yourself, whether it put the odds in my favour or not is irrelevant. 8(b). I think I will argue with pictures later. First of all you have the burden to prove that such an evil scientist lives. You also have the burden to show that these children will be made into robots. Also there is a brown haired person who does not cross his legs. Untill you can prove this your argument is moot, the resolution does not stand, and I win. s://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com...; alt="" /> School Uniforms are often hot: s://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com...; alt="" /> Sweet Jesus! s://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com...; alt="" /> Ajab