• CON

    In negating this resolution I will argue specifically...

    abortion should be illegal in first trimester, but not investigated nor punished*

    I feel like there wasn't any formalized argumentation from my opponent to start this debate, so I fee like this is a chance for me to present an opening statement of sorts that explains where my argumentation in this debate is going to go. Abortion is a subject that people simply refuse to agree to disagree upon. Thus, I feel that this is an important debate. I look forward to seeing what argumentation my opponent plans to provide. In negating this resolution I will argue specifically that the legality of an action comes form the idea that one's rights end where another's begin. This is a basic legal philosophy constructed by John Stuart Mills and is where we justify legal principles and laws. Using this conception of the law and justice, I will argue that abortion should not be illegal in the sense that abortion does not infringe upon a fetus' rights (if they indeed have any) in such a manner that it constitutes law to prevent it. I will explain this more fully in my further argumentation. Good luck to my opponent. I look forward to debating such an important issue with you.

    • https://www.debate.org/debates/abortion-should-be-illegal-in-first-trimester-but-not-investigated-nor-punished/1/