args

Human caused climate change is nonsense

>>>In order to win a debate, You have to, Either show evidence or use logic to convince the voters that you are correct and that your opponent is wrong. You have done neither of these basic things so far. I have shown evidence. For example, In Round 1 I gave evidence that burning fossil fuels causes global warming. I will cite my sources in the comments. I have also rebutted your arguments. Note: you do not need to use logic in your rebuttals. You can simply state why something would not work. . . Also, You have claimed that having studied the properties of CO2 for 10 years gives you a position of authority on the matter. It does not. Your conspiracy theory makes little sense, And you have refuted none of my arguments. For example, You said that: The Arctic had forest growth as recent as 1000 years ago Climate researchers are fraudulent They manipulated the evidence There is no evidence for any of these claims, And then for you to say: "And thus all climate researchers are criminals and global warming doesn't exist" is plainly ridiculous. As previously said, I will cite my sources in the comments. And if you state that the sources are from You have done neither of these basic things so far. I have shown evidence. For example, In Round 1 I gave evidence that burning fossil fuels causes global warming. I will cite my sources in the comments. I have also rebutted your arguments. Note: you do not need to use logic in your rebuttals. You can simply state why something would not work. . . Also, You have claimed that having studied the properties of CO2 for 10 years gives you a position of authority on the matter. It does not. Your conspiracy theory makes little sense, And you have refuted none of my arguments. For example, You said that: The Arctic had forest growth as recent as 1000 years ago Climate researchers are fraudulent They manipulated the evidence There is no evidence for any of these claims, And then for you to say: "And thus all climate researchers are criminals and global warming doesn't exist" is plainly ridiculous. As previously said, I will cite my sources in the comments. And if you state that the sources are from climate research organisations, Well - yes, They are, But there is no evidence for the fact that climate researchers are fraudulent, So that's an invalid dispute.