args

Human caused climate change is nonsense

In order to win a debate, You have to, Either show evidence or use logic to convince the voters that you are correct and that your opponent is wrong. You have done neither of these basic things so far. There is simply not enough CO2 in the atmosphere to cause any dramatic climate change. The Earth's climate has changed in the past but this was due to volcanic activity. Volcanoes can expel a thousand times more CO2 than what humans can achieve. A volcano expels other sulphur based gases which cause a shielding effect in the upper atmosphere. This is what happened during the Dark Ages when sunlight was reduced and a mini ice age occurred. Humans are like microscopic organisms on the surface of the Earth. Our combined mass is insufficient to be able the affect the huge mass of the Earth. This is just a matter of understanding basic heat transfer science in relation to two objects of dissimilar size and mass. I have pointed out already that the properties of CO2 are similar to glass and increasing the amount of CO2 doesn't correlate with a subsequent rise in temperature. But you have just dismissed this statement without offering any counter argument. You have done the same with my thermostat analogy of You have done neither of these basic things so far. There is simply not enough CO2 in the atmosphere to cause any dramatic climate change. The Earth's climate has changed in the past but this was due to volcanic activity. Volcanoes can expel a thousand times more CO2 than what humans can achieve. A volcano expels other sulphur based gases which cause a shielding effect in the upper atmosphere. This is what happened during the Dark Ages when sunlight was reduced and a mini ice age occurred. Humans are like microscopic organisms on the surface of the Earth. Our combined mass is insufficient to be able the affect the huge mass of the Earth. This is just a matter of understanding basic heat transfer science in relation to two objects of dissimilar size and mass. I have pointed out already that the properties of CO2 are similar to glass and increasing the amount of CO2 doesn't correlate with a subsequent rise in temperature. But you have just dismissed this statement without offering any counter argument. You have done the same with my thermostat analogy of climate. You have just dismissed it and not offered any counter argument. When you are debating, You can't just keep discrediting information without offering a logical reason or evidence to disprove the other person's theory or evidence. Quote - The Earth's temperature system is a closed system in the sense that it does not interact with any other systems. Reply - This statement doesn't make any sense. The Earth does interact with other systems. The sun, Moon and planets all have an impact and effect on the Earth's climate. The sun is the most important climate maker. In fact, Without the sun, The Earth's temperature would be about 3 degrees off absolute zero. Thus, The sun is the only thing that keeps us humans alive and breathing. Without the sun, We would all freeze to death in a matter of days. Note - The IPCC doesn't recognize the existence of the sun. I have looked through hundreds of pages of IPCC climate reports and can't find any mention of the sun. This is how stupid this organisation is. They can't see the bleeding obvious. False data. In the beginning, There were two climate researchers - Keith Briffa and Michael Mann. They both had conflicting data about tree ring data concerning climate. The IPCC decided to appoint Michael Mann as the chief researcher because his data more suited their agenda of dramatic climate change. Note - Organisations like the IPCC need reasons to exist so they are constantly trying to find justifications for their existence and ongoing viability. Thus, By choosing Michael Mann as the chief researcher they ignored and deleted all of Keith Briffa's data which contradicted Mann's climate data. Thus, We have the introduction of the dramatic hockey stick graph which shows a huge upswing in global temperature which has been assessed through the dubious use of tree ring data. Then there was the intercepted email from Michael Mann which used the words "hide the the trick" included in the message. Note - The 'trick' was the inversion of the graph which showed a decline in temperature. Note - Modern analysis of tree ring data using present day tree growth doesn't indicate any temperature differential. Thus, Tree ring growth may only indicate the amount of moisture available to the tree and not indicate temperature. This updated information was ignored by the IPCC because it didn't suit their agenda of finding a man-made catastrophe. Note - Recent research has found that the Arctic had forest growth as recent as 1000 years ago during the Roman Empire warming period. Thus, This information is deleted and hidden from the public by the IPCC criminals. Thus, We can plainly see that climate change scientists are all riding the gravy train of climate change hysteria and getting piles of cash from the government to do more and more useless research into climate change.