This is not a debate on whether anthropogenic climate...
Anthropogenic climate change and increased CO2 levels are beneficial to humans and plant life
I will be arguing for the above. My opponent will argue that climate change is not beneficial to humans and plant life. This is not a debate on whether anthropogenic climate change occurs. We will assume it does in this debate. If you don't believe in anthropogenic climate change, you're still welcome to do this debate with me, if you just assume it does exist. You would be arguing that if anthropogenic climate change exists, it is not beneficial to humans and plant life. Common definitions for terms will be used. Rules: 1) No ad hominem, personal attacks, or insults 2) The total number of rounds minus one should be used for argument. This is to keep the total number of rounds used for argument even between us, since I am not using round 1 for argument 3) The last round used for argument should just be rebuttal/defense.