Thus, Scientists have no incentive to disprove climate...
Climate change and global warming are both total nonsense and drivel concepts.
CO2 is a trace gas - 0. 04 % of the atmosphere is CO2. There isn't enough CO2 to effect anything. CO2 has the same properties as glass. Once you reach it's saturation point of around 80 parts per million you get very little and a rapid decrease in any further reflection of the infra red spectrum. The earth is not like a greenhouse. The Earth is more like a thermostat. It transfers hot and cold air. A greenhouse doesn't transfer hot and cold air. Thus, A thermostat is a self regulating system which maintains an even temperature. A greenhouse is an enclosed space which doesn't allow air to circulate and the space becomes hotter than what the exterior environment is. This all assuming that a hotter planet would be a bad place to live in which is another false assumption. Note- A hotter climate would be beneficial to all living plants and animals. Whereas a cooler climate would be a disaster because less sunlight and lower temperatures mean less shelter and food for all plants and animals. Thus, This highlights the utter stupidity of the climate alarmists whom assume that a warmer climate would lead to some kind of disaster. Note - All studies which show that humans are to blame for the climate changing contain false data and are produced by scientists that have hidden agendas. Note - Scientists need to create disasters so as to create jobs for themselves and to increase their income, Status and career prospects. Thus, Scientists have no incentive to disprove climate change because if they do, They will find themselves being blacklisted and out of work permanently. Thus, Scientists are glad to agree with climate change because it ensures their future and safeguards their reputations.