therefore you can go ahead and drop his contentions, now...
Developed Coutries have a moral obligation to mitigate the effects of climate change.
So my oppenents case is all about attacking me, he has not included any evidence to suppot his attacks, not only this but he also has failed to rebut his own case. therefore you can go ahead and drop his contentions, now onto my own case. for my contention one his only attack on it was that i was ignoring the uncontrollable changes, yet i have mentioned before that cooling the ocean floor would actually solve those "uncontrollable changes" that he has no evidence to support. for his second attack he said that places like norway are in debt alot, but in my conclusion i state that we would actually gain money from this therefore that arguement is no longer valid. for his last and final attack says that climate change is a moral right, yet his definition of it was invalid. he also said that my definition was wrong and didn't offer a counter solution.