args

Should creationism be taught in schools? (Evolution vs Creation)

rebuttals yes, evolution is backed up by science because it is a scientific theory, while creationism is not backed by science because it is a belief. creationism is not a science, it should not be taught like one. My oponent has failed to realized that i am not advocating this to be taught as a science. I am advocating for creationism to be taught as a footnote in our education system where we must understand this belief. Creationism is not the rejection of science, but it rather a different ideological perspective on things that is in a different faith based realm away from science. creationism is as real as you believe it is. Let me reiterate, my job is not to prove that creationism, it is explain why it should remain to be taught in our school system and to explain how it can be a viable explanation. If there are hundreds of millions christians out there who believe in this thought, why should it not be atleast mentioned? our school system is here to educate us. Creationism i must reiterate, should not be held to the same standards as a science, nor should it be taught in science class. It should be taught in classes like history etc where it is relevant because it has altered billions of peoples lives and their perception on things. Also the understanding of some basic creationism is imperative to understand the history of our world. (the constitution has the words "e hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."). according to the interpretations of con's version of an education system, we should not teach our children folklore and we should create a whole education system purely based upon science. Does anyone else see the very lack of creativity that cannot be inspired? con has failed to address my final argument which i have repetively made, but here i will readdress them in an organized manner that i have proposed a "viable explanation" God has created all humans. That is a viable explanation for our existance A)viable-capable of working B)explanation-statement that makes something clear C)therefore, a viable explanation is an explanation that is= capable of working to make something clear D)God created all humans. This clarifies who made humans, how humans were made, and this is capable to convince because millions of people believe in this, and that is a fact. (brooo, why we got 3 rounds of rebuttals? we gotta rererebuttal then)