args

palmer should not receive the inheritance from the will.

The defedant caused the death to the will writer, Francis B Palmer. 2. The power and construction of a will should be respected in ever sense. 3. To test a will's basic principle, one should consider that a court has no right of altering, annualling and / or voiding an already existing will upon it's writer's death. 4. There aren't any statues that support that the defendant should be denied any funds from the will because of his past criminal acts. 5. To accept such facts mentioned about the defedant criminal actions is to expand the statues that makes this particular case expost factor. 6. There are no conclusive facts that more provisions of the will were ever going to take place before the testor death. 7. No will shall ever be alter, revoked, as the court main priority is this case. 8. Therefore, should the court decide take away money that belong to the defendant that belong to the defendant, the court would be making a new will or altering one. Non-controversial: 1. A valid will should always remain as it is unless a law or a statue to be otherwise. 2. The will of Frances B. Palmer is said to include his grandson as a heir to a part of his estate. 3. Therefore, defandant Palmer should have the right to funds in accordance with the will. Contoversial: The court does not have the right nor the power to rewrite or alter an existing will.