args

is evolution real

OK, Good argument but there are some holes. First the idea that since very few transitional forms were ever found that this disproves evolution. This is expected when working with fossils due the the very precise conditions required to form the fossil in the first place, And second these transitional form may just be one or 2 individuals and the odds of them becoming fossilized is incredibly slim. Second you seem to think that we find fossils of entire animals, That rarely ever happens typically archaeologists find say a femur, Tooth, Or spinal vertebra which they then have to cross reference with every other fossil ever found in order to classify it. So in a way every single fossil is questionable since the bones weren't found in the same place, And the bones aren't even from the same individual. Next I will provide some examples of evolution that you can't refute because the specimens are sitting on the dinner table. Take the cucumber for example, Or as it is actually called the domestic cucumber ( I know it sounds weird but trust me any widely grow plant is considered domesticated) Its wild for in about 1/8 the size, Cover in 2 inch long spines, And is POISONOUS. People grew them for medical purposes because of their bitter taste they believed it to be a healing herb. I will now address your point on mutualism, The sweetlips didn't learn to seek out the cleaner fish, The cleaner fish sought out the sweetlips. It probably started with small fish that would pick bits of food from its teeth when it was distracted, Then as the fish would inevitably start to realize that the smaller fish cleaning its teeth prevented them from rotting, And before you say that "they couldn't have done that, They aren't smart enough" Take into consideration the Tusk fish. This fish uses simple tools, It will spent its entire life searching for a coral growth that is just the right size and strength, It will use the coral it crack open small clams much like the way chimps use rocks to crack nuts. And I'm just saying sorry in advance I'm using a school computer at the moment and the link s you sent didn't work so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on those. And finally my argument without evolution how can you explain the diversity of life over the years for, Dinosaurs and their obviously warm tropic climate. ( yes we know what the climate was like back then, Next round if you would like to see a link I'll provide one) to the wholly mammoth an animal that was clearly meant for a colder climate. How do you explain Continental drift and the time it took for our contents to drift this far. How do you explain the lack of modern animals in the deeper areas of the fossil record, But when we have animals that are very similar in shape, Size and the same species. Next how do you explain the different species of humans, Like Neanderthal, And cromadnid. And because i feel like I will give you example of fish moving onto land today, The oceanic blenny spends its entire life out of water it absorbs air through its skin and the species actively avoids contact with water, Due to their muscles having adapted to walking not swimming, This makes them poor swimmers. And t=studies have should that they are slowly moving farther away from the water with each passing year by a distance of about 2 inches, Not a lot but still its ground breaking because here we have a fish, Not only breathing air in its gaseous state, But also slowly migrating away from the water. And further more to end I would like to see solid, Concrete evidence for biblical creation, Because if 1 must have solid evidence so must the other. Man dude you should have increased the time limit.