args

The United States Government ought to provide Universal Healthcare for its Citizens

Hello ladies and gentlemen. Are you all seated comfortably? No, not you inferno. No-one cares what you think. Everyone else? Splendid. We are gathered here today to bear witness to the union... Sorry, wrong notes. Its the wedding ceremony Mirza made me prepare for ViVeri, in his words, "just in-case" What I meant to say is that the burden of proof lies with the 35th Arch-Bishop Ann Gel (I'm glad to see the church appointing female Bishops to such high positions in the church). So friends, comrades, acquaintances and Imabench, as the good Bishop has not defined her terms, one can only assume that she wishes to let this humble sky pirate have this honour and define the relevant and potentially contentious terms; Should; a moral obligation. X should do Y because of the moral implications. Universal health care: a health care system which provides coverage to all of its citizens. So little hobbitses, my pious 'pponent must not only prove that this cause is worth while, but also that moral implications exist. Otherwise she would be committing the is-ought fallacy. With out further ado, let the hunger games begin! All praise be to satan, forever and ever. Amen.