If kids can't afford designer clothes, they could just go...
Uniforms or not
Hello, wooferalot. I will pick apart your points individually. You said: "In a disaster, it would be hard to get identified quickly because everyone looks the same." Actually, they could all move in a group and infiltrators could easily be spotted. And we are not arguing a universal uniform. I am arguing a strict drees code. There is a difference. "Some family's can't even afford the uniform that the school would want." Some families cant afford the desinger clothes that are all the latest fads, so lets not stray away from the main topic that much. "If a kid is in elementry school, they will want to wear what they want." That is a complete generalization. I know elementary kids that wear cardigan sweaters and they like it and it is the universal dress code. "When they are older, the clothes that they wanted to wear will not fit them when they are an adult." By fit I assume you mean are suitable, as opposed to actually physically fitting them. There are may jobs that let you wear what you want. There are also jobs that have something called "casual friday." "If kids can't afford designer clothes, they could just go to some place like gap, old navy, or walmart etc..." Most gap stuff is designer, and is quite fashionable, as is old navy. I concede walmart to you. "Some kids like to express themselves with what they wear. Kids are only kids for a little while." This is also a generalization, and why should kids have to express themselves with what they wear? they should be expressing themselves by their actions. "It also teaches little kids how to match clothes for when they are older. When they are older, they might still have to where uniforms." And by saying they will have to choose clothes when they are older, you knock out your previous statement. Unless they are in an army or other force, they will not have to wear a uniform. Maybe a suit, or an apron, or a frock, but no uniform. Thank you.