My opponent appears to think that whether the IPCC is a...
The climate is not "a changing".
I have clearly stated that the IPCC is a communist organisation to which my opponent has not offered any counter argument. Thus, We can only assume that my opponent agrees with this statement thus far. My opponent appears to think that whether the IPCC is a communist organisation or not is relevant to the debate. My opponent should note that when participating in a debate all the items in the first round should be addressed. It is up to the judges of the debate to decide if any part of the debate is irrelevant and it is not part of con's duty or responsibility to decide what is relevant and what is not relevant. This is because the IPCC is an untrustworthy organisation which has political agendas which have nothing to do with climate. Thus, If they are using climate as a tool of political manipulation then, This should be addressed as important evidence. Just because my opponent can't see any structure in my first round doesn't imply that there is no structure. Of course, It would be of great advantage to my opponent if he could eliminate the IPCC from the debate because the IPCC has a very bad record of corruption and supplying misinformation about the My opponent appears to think that whether the IPCC is a communist organisation or not is relevant to the debate. My opponent should note that when participating in a debate all the items in the first round should be addressed. It is up to the judges of the debate to decide if any part of the debate is irrelevant and it is not part of con's duty or responsibility to decide what is relevant and what is not relevant. This is because the IPCC is an untrustworthy organisation which has political agendas which have nothing to do with climate. Thus, If they are using climate as a tool of political manipulation then, This should be addressed as important evidence. Just because my opponent can't see any structure in my first round doesn't imply that there is no structure. Of course, It would be of great advantage to my opponent if he could eliminate the IPCC from the debate because the IPCC has a very bad record of corruption and supplying misinformation about the climate. Thus, My opponent would very much rather not discuss the IPCC for these very reasons.