args

The climate is not "a changing".

On the IPCC I have been provided no actual evidence for the IPCC evaluating the sources I used prior to the data’s submission. This will remain a red herring until you can prove that the IPCC must analyze all climate change information information before it’s published. It would also be acceptable if you prove they analyzed the data I used as sources. His two sources (listed in the comments) agree that they analyze all their own data before they submit it, But that much is obvious. He has so far provided 2 sources, Both which contradict him in several areas, And support my own position (that the IPCC is not relevant to NASA’s data collection system(s)). [8][9] – His sources, In comments Rebuttal Con presents Murry Salby without actually listing a paper, Quote, Or citation. This is an argument from authority and irrelevant to me. If you are going to state someone refutes something, Show his research and papers specifically that you believe supports such an assertion. Quote: “It"s not just that man-made emissions don"t control the climate, They don"t even control global CO2 levels. ” This is a severe misconception, It doesn’t require an expansive amount of increase to offset the natural balance of the global carbon cycle. Altough our output of 25-30 gigatons of CO2 is tiny relative to the 750 gigatons moving through the Oceans, It will add up because the land cannot properly absorb this additional CO2 naturally. Because of the above, The current CO2 levels are at the highest level in 15-20 million years. [7] Quote: “CO2 variations do not correlate with man-made emissions. Peaks and falls correlate with hot years (e. G. 1998) and cold years (1991-92). ” I never denied yearly fluctuations, But the mean temperature is increasing drastically and has been since the industrial revolution. On rising sea levels All the worlds oceans are connected, But sea level is influenced by things such as gravity, Currents, And wind. There is also, The fact that land also shifts gradually over time. The truth is that Japan has seen sea level rise, Just less extreme comparative to some other continents. There are several islands that have just completely disappeared in Micronesia. This is a simple proof that sea level is rising, And that islands are decreasing in size. Depending on the height of the island, These changes will be more noticeable/extreme. Defense Quote: “Muana Loa is a volcano. Thus, Could you trust a CO2 measurement taken from the top of a volcano? ” Go to the next tab over, The Global averages – that was the intended source. In defense of NASA I would imagine the sun is the only driver of the Earth’s climate, Isn’t that blatantly obvious? The greenhouse effect is where radiation (from the sun) is reflected by the atmosphere. Without the Sun we wouldn’t be alive, So I presume the article was just removed due to it being misleading. “NASA Science said things like clouds, Albedo and aerosol behaviour can have more powerful cooling effects that outdo the warming effect of CO2. ” Perhaps, But this isn’t likely, Especially if we continue the exponential increase of our CO2 production. This is what I mean by misleading, It’s possible certainly, But nothing we should rely upon to save us. Sources on profile