args

The climate is not "a changing".

Quote - "it IS a red herring" OK Little Adolf, If you say so, IT MUST BE TRUE! Little does my clueless opponent know that all global warming and or climate change data has to be certified by the IPCC before it can be published. Thus, He is just talking a load of BS. It only triggers my disgust to see such uninformed authoritarian style bullying tactics. My opponent is obviously just a novice at this kind of debate and has no experience living in the real world. He has swallowed all the media and political hype surrounding this issue. My opponent clearly lacks logic and knowledge of language usage. He says that I didn't make an argument and then goes on to define an argument that I had made. WOW! That's what I would call a major contradiction. Lol I hope my opponent keeps tripping over his own stupidity. It will make my job much easier. The evidence 1a. Professor Murry Salby is Chair of Climate Science at Macquarie University. He"s been a visiting professorships at Paris, Stockholm, Jerusalem, And Kyoto, And he"s spent time at the Bureau of Meterology in Australia. Over the last two years he has been looking at C12 and C13 ratios and CO2 levels around the world, And has come to the conclusion that man-made emissions have only a small effect on global CO2 levels. It"s not just that man-made emissions don"t control the climate, They don"t even control global CO2 levels. CO2 variations do not correlate with man-made emissions. Peaks and falls correlate with hot years (e. G. 1998) and cold years (1991-92). Note - Muana Loa is a volcano. Thus, Could you trust a CO2 measurement taken from the top of a volcano? This is just a cynical exercise of making up big impressive numbers from dubious locations which should be considered inappropriate for anything to do with average CO2 emissions. My opinion is that the data stinks of corruption and meddling. I wouldn't trust it. Sea levels rising? Note - All the worlds oceans are connected as one large body of fluid or water. Thus, If one area of ocean is not rising, Then all the other areas didn't rise either. If they did rise independently, Then, Obviously somebody is telling a big lie. Now, Japan hasn't recorded any rise in seas levels which also proves via logic, That all the worlds oceans didn't rise either. Ref - jonova - sea levels not rising This should end all the Pacific Island climate claims right here. A new study of over 700 islands for decades shows that even though seas are rising faster than any time in the last million years, Somehow no islands with people on are shrinking. This means there are no climate change refugees from any vanishing island. Plus it"s more proof that highly adjusted satellite data is recording sea levels on some other planet. Over the past decades, Atoll islands exhibited no widespread sign of physical destabilization in the face of sea-level rise. A reanalysis of available data, Which cover 30 Pacific and Indian Ocean atolls including 709 islands, Reveals that no atoll lost land area and that 88. 6% of islands were either stable or increased in area, While only 11. 4% contracted. NASA hiding data - Jonova website NASA hides page saying the Sun was the primary climate driver, And clouds and particles are more important than greenhouse gases ZeroHedge asks: What the hell are NASA Hiding? The NASA site used to have a page titled "What are the primary forcings of the Earth system? ". In 2010 this page said that the Sun is the major driver of Earth"s climate, That it controls all the major aspects, And we may be on the cusp of an ice age. Furthermore NASA Science said things like clouds, Albedo and aerosol behaviour can have more powerful cooling effects that outdo the warming effect of CO2. Thus, We can plainly see the deceptions and trickery of both NASA and the IPCC scientists who all have an agenda to promote global climate change/ warming/cooling/ madness. Note - In the 1970's most scientists were worried about global cooling. Give me a break! These jerks don't know anything but how to get money from the government to fund their next holiday in the Bahamas to study sea levels. Lol Good luck in trying to defend this climate change rubbish. Lol