args

Human-Caused Climate Change is Impossible

"New variables? New from what? " There was never plastic before humans arrived - is that not a new variable? Emissions from gas-powered vehicles have never been around until we invented them, Is that not a new variable? "And have evolved through natural Earthly means" So we weren't here over 200, 000 - when we came into being, Were we not a new variable? A new species? A new life form? Naturally or not, We came into existence and weren't always around. "Here's where the debate shifts to a "Pre-Determinism vs Free Will" debate" Uhh. . No? If you're saying me murdering your family will hold me accountable due to free will, Then climate change that was done due to human involvement is an act of free will and we'd be accountable - right? "I actually believe we ARE "foreign entities"" Then you've destroyed your whole argument by saying if x, Then p. And then claiming not x - which was your only logical path to p. You said we can't say human-caused climate change is possible without saying we are a foreign entity. Then you say we ARE a foreign entity. Even if I don't agree with you, You've already destroyed your own argument. "One must conclude that if Humans are causing If you're saying me murdering your family will hold me accountable due to free will, Then climate change that was done due to human involvement is an act of free will and we'd be accountable - right? "I actually believe we ARE "foreign entities"" Then you've destroyed your whole argument by saying if x, Then p. And then claiming not x - which was your only logical path to p. You said we can't say human-caused climate change is possible without saying we are a foreign entity. Then you say we ARE a foreign entity. Even if I don't agree with you, You've already destroyed your own argument. "One must conclude that if Humans are causing Climate Change in a catastrophic way. . . We MUST be foreign entities in the Universe, Since without our ability to consciously comprehend, Study, And adjust to life conditions (the warming of the Earth, For example) we must be separate and apart from the subjects we are studying. " That makes as much sense as saying that black people are racist against rocks. "It's accurate in the sense that it's impossible only if we are evolved entities which developed from the Earth" You've yet to prove this. If humans evolved on Earth with intelligence, And then created destruction, And noticed this destruction as they advanced scientifically, What about this would require us to be foreign bodies? "And implanted into it through an Intelligent Designer/ God. " Is this actually a debate where you want to prove God? What is this BS? You're argument makes no sense, And your conclusion comes out of no where and isn't backed up by anything else you've said. There is no God, And we are not foreign entities. How with these conclusions can we say climate change by humans is impossible? What about being put on the Earth through evolution or God makes human-caused climate change possible or impossible?