args

Unvaccinated children should be home-schooled

"That being said there are other methods of learning and accessing a proper education outside of public school also this debate is nothing more than hypothetical scenario for me. I will further support my points below." Public School is the Most widely accessed form of Education in America(1)(2), so I don't take it Lightly that it's a "Hypothetical" Scenario. "Contention 1: The Constitution makes no mention of education reserving it as a right given on the state level, See the 10th amendment. The state ultimately has the power over educational institution and ultimately makes all the laws. There is a universal right to an education but there is no universal right to attend any specific public education institution. This would not infringe upon the free will of an individual at all seeing as they have the right to vaccinate or not vaccinate, but access to state regulated public schools can be restricted for good reason without infringing on rights or being unlawful. (students who have been expelled). (1)" Pro, You are Correct when you say the State "has the power over educational institution and ultimately makes all the laws". The State has the Power to Deny Welfare. The State has the Power to deny Financial Assistance The State has the Power to Evict, Control, and Abuse Private Property I don't think that Justifies the notion of the Denial of Education. "Contention 2: See my above point. No free wills are being broken here." See the Link I provided. "By Social Contract I mean parents typically know better than to send a sick child to school because their child could infect the others. Children contract viruses and diseases from each other at school all the time. Vaccinated children are still capable of spreading diseases to the unaffected, leaving them at a very high risk and allowing that child to be a powerful vehicle for the disease. (2)" Pro, It seems like your trying to create a Straw Man Argument here. "parents typically know better than to send a sick child to school because their child could infect the others" That's not the Debate Topic. And to go even Further, Parent's DO keep there Kids home when They're Sick, So your Straw Man Argument is invalid, Lol. "Children contract viruses and diseases from each other at school all the time." Pro, that's a Bold statement to make. Provide Statistics if you feel that way. "Vaccinated children are still capable of spreading diseases to the unaffected, leaving them at a very high risk and allowing that child to be a powerful vehicle for the disease. (2)" Vaccinated Children are still capable of Spreading Disease? Isn't this Contradicting your Platform? So according to your logic, we There is a universal right to an education but there is no universal right to attend any specific public education institution. This would not infringe upon the free will of an individual at all seeing as they have the right to vaccinate or not vaccinate, but access to state regulated public schools can be restricted for good reason without infringing on rights or being unlawful. (students who have been expelled). (1)" Pro, You are Correct when you say the State "has the power over educational institution and ultimately makes all the laws". The State has the Power to Deny Welfare. The State has the Power to deny Financial Assistance The State has the Power to Evict, Control, and Abuse Private Property I don't think that Justifies the notion of the Denial of Education. "Contention 2: See my above point. No free wills are being broken here." See the Link I provided. "By Social Contract I mean parents typically know better than to send a sick child to school because their child could infect the others. Children contract viruses and diseases from each other at school all the time. Vaccinated children are still capable of spreading diseases to the unaffected, leaving them at a very high risk and allowing that child to be a powerful vehicle for the disease. (2)" Pro, It seems like your trying to create a Straw Man Argument here. "parents typically know better than to send a sick child to school because their child could infect the others" That's not the Debate Topic. And to go even Further, Parent's DO keep there Kids home when They're Sick, So your Straw Man Argument is invalid, Lol. "Children contract viruses and diseases from each other at school all the time." Pro, that's a Bold statement to make. Provide Statistics if you feel that way. "Vaccinated children are still capable of spreading diseases to the unaffected, leaving them at a very high risk and allowing that child to be a powerful vehicle for the disease. (2)" Vaccinated Children are still capable of Spreading Disease? Isn't this Contradicting your Platform? So according to your logic, we Should Deny Children the Right to an Education because of Others, not Themselves. "Measles was declared eliminated in the US by 2000 and its recent comeback can be attributed to the growing population of unaffected children. This is a reference to a CDC study supporting my point." People Globally Contract this Disease, and if Through Travel, Bring Measles to America, It's that Individuals Fault. That's How it Re-entered the US. I'd Like to Point out that the Strain That multiple people contracted was a New one, and Vaccinated Individuals were affected as well. (3) "This is irrelevant to my argument. Back to you!" As I stated and Provided, A Child's right to an Education is Mandatory in the US, as Chartered in the Child's act, and a Referendum created by the UN, and Signed by many Nations, US being one of course.(1) Children have the Right to a Quality Education, Regardless. (1)(https://www.google.ca...) (2)(https://www.google.ca...) (3)(https://www.google.ca...)